Every
person’s history is different.
I started
cooking when I was in college without even a proper stove and with one dish
only, a family recipe of tomato sauce pasta. I would make it every 3 or 4 days
for 3 years in a row. That was a big hit with all of my friends and I am sure
their praise was essential to reinforce this aspect of my identity
Working later in Morocco, with beautiful local
produce, appetizing markets and a growing number of friends, I started expanding
my repertoire, one recipe at a time, trying to imitate some restaurant fare,
exchanging tips with others, exploring new tastes and cooking techniques, slowly
gaining experience.
Afterwards, I continued to try out new things. I
sought to master a good range of techniques, I accumulated layers of
observations and knowledge, I learned to cook faster and more efficiently so
that this activity would remain compatible with my job demands. Now that
I can cook, I have almost forgotten how I got here.
I can
steam, fry or grill. I can use a stove, an oven or a fireplace. I can chop,
carve any fowl, stagger the incorporation of ingredients in the right order so
that they are all properly cooked in the end. I can pick out the best oranges
at the market or the freshest fish. No doubt there was a lot to learn and know
but everything has become second nature, and somehow the process is ever more
enjoyable. (1) And guess what? I am still learning every day.
The Shortcomings of Taste Criticism
While
music and visual arts benefit from thorough analyses and criticism by learned
experts, taste and smell have no equivalent.
Countless
experts study minute differences between Mahler’s and Strauss’ composing
styles, using a host of arcane concepts and communicating regularly on their
findings, but nothing of the sort exists for cooking. We attempt to make our
musical or visual emotions more explicit but, when it comes to analyzing a good
dish, we unfortunately tend to limit our comments to the universal sound of
Mmmmmh!
For wine
tasting, a great effort has been made to rationalize different components of
the process, from the initial visual aspects to primary and secondary olfactory
experiences. Still, even with these rational crutches, tasting experiences
remain different for different persons.
No
conceptual tool that I know of exists to analyze cooked dishes. Our senses are
imperfect. There are too many variables, too many aromas. We cannot put words
on our emotions. It is the rare person who can identify the different
components of a complex final taste. (2)
In most
languages, we have given different labels to different colors. Some individuals
may still disagree on the color of a given object, is it blue or grey for
example, but at least, they can discuss it. No such thing exists for matters of
flavor. I guess we just have to accept this state of affairs.
Countless times, at the end of a good meal, guests
have commented with a definitive : “You should open a restaurant…” This well-meaning form of praise pleases me
of course, but the truth is that cooking professionally demands an overriding
interest and devotion I’ve never had. Restaurant cooking is a different
discipline, more demanding, more formalized, where you want to achieve a
well-defined, constant result.
Actually, famed top restaurants, which I once
relished, often disappoint me today, in part because I may have lost some taste
acuity, but also because they are forced by their economics to engage in a kind
of meaningless escalation. Their customers are well-moneyed people with
hesitating taste buds who are reassured by a steep price tag. Rare and
expensive ingredients will make their dining experience more unique and
memorable, and thus justify the price.
I am disappointed by a cuisine which is often
repetitive, too focused on protein, and too rich for me. Innovators do not fare
much better. As I favor paying homage to a given ingredient, I like to
recognize its original shape, and the latest trend of “molecular cuisine,”
designed to provide new textures to old flavors, leaves me generally cold.
Nevertheless, the artists who own these restaurants
can still dramatically surprise you and change your perspective forever. They
keep exploring with devotion and humility, associating flavors, probing new
techniques, contributing to the wealth of cooking possibilities and inspiring
the rest of us.
At this stage, my ideal 3-star restaurant dish would
be Michel Bras’ Gargouillou, an ever changing vegetable dish combining
individually cooked vegetables, aromatic leaves, flowers, mushrooms, and a
simple thin slice of local dried ham. This is cooking laid bare, a symphonic bliss when experiencing
it in the restaurant, visually and gustatorily, sophisticated yet austere.
You go back home ready to make your own very imperfect
version, or revert to simpler home-cooking dishes: A
vegetable stew of carrots, onions and sweet peas, a thick grilled white veal cutlet with lemon and garlic,
a ratatouille, stuffed vegetables, a good
roasted chicken with perfect French fries.
By the
way, all of these have no complicated sauce, just
natural cooking juices. All are delightfully simple to prepare and rewarding.
The hardest part is procurement. Where will you find the exceptional
ingredients that will make your home dishes almost as distinctive and
satisfying as more complex restaurant experiences?
A Feast for the Senses
Cooking challenges your intellect and your senses.
With experience, you use all of them, all the time, as
you advance in your preparation. You know if your onions are ready by looking
at them, or smelling them. A change in a gentle frying noise warns you that an
ominous burning accident is about to happen. You can tell when a vegetable is
ready by the look, the smell or by poking it lightly.
You also develop a critical sense you didn’t know you
had, the sense of passing time. Without ever looking at a clock, you learn to
know when it’s time to broil the other side of your steak, when it’s time to
start re-heating the vegetables that will go with it, when your boiling pasta
is ready, and even when to start preparing the three-course dinner you have
planned for tonight.
Far from being a chore or a waste of time, every
mundane action, like peeling potatoes, becomes a contemplative ritual, deeply
satisfying in itself. It is about loving that potato, seeing the flesh
appear under the skin, thinking about the Machu Picchu or the Great Irish
famine, pondering the best seasoning to complement it later on.
It is also about using a knife, a fascinating tool which
demands that you concentrate on the “here and now,” whether you are slicing
fish for sashimi or chopping up ingredients for your mirepoix.
In short, cooking is about using your hands and your
brain, an experience close to the artistic process, with the same addictive and
rewarding effect.
The Love of Life
Let’s not be squeamish. We eat in order to live, and
for that we must take away the life of other living organisms: Fish and cattle,
chicken and egg. Even vegetables or cereals die when we decide to use them for
our own good.
Japanese people routinely thank nature’s bounties
before they start any meal, uniting the enjoyment and the sacred. For cooks,
who essentially deal with raw ingredients and transform them, this appreciation
should start even earlier, at the market. (3)
I love going food shopping. I may have a good idea of
some of the items I want to buy: fish, for example, or poultry that we have not
had in a while. Variety is a key to a good diet and I certainly maximize this
aspect. But mostly, produce dictates its will, serendipitously: I select
ingredients because they inspire me that day, because of the way they will
complement my previous purchases or simply because they look or smell so good!
Abiding by the season is a sure way to respect nature
and mark the passage of time. For example, in southern France, May is the month
of new sweet green peas, fava beans, and green garlic, marking spring’s
renewal.
Even if tomatoes are today available all the time,
everywhere, in all shapes and forms, I use them sparingly, either raw or
cooked, until they are vine-ripened and give off their haunting aroma, from
July to September.
For me,
the main benefit of local produce is not so much its abstract lower carbon
footprint as its short supply chain and its generally better taste. These
gleaming strawberries were picked yesterday, at the same time this firm
mackerel was brought to port auction. What luxury! How can it be better than
that?
Fusion or Confusion?
Fusion
starts when you spread butter on a slice of bread and associate these two
flavors. In a way, it is synonymous with cuisine.
Even
before the great exploratory boom of the 15th and 16th
centuries, many fruits, vegetables and cereals had moved away from their
original zone of cultivation and were adopted by other populations. In Europe,
to flavor a rather bland diet, spices were imported from the Far-East at great
cost.
Then,
European and Western choices changed drastically and for the better after the
“discovery” of the Americas made many new ingredients available. Timid at
first, the rate of change gradually accelerated to the point where these
ingredients are now cornerstones of the different cuisines of France, Italy or
the like. All these “new” traditional cuisines developed independently,
building on previous knowhow, local preferences, climate, growing season and
adaptability. French and Italian cuisines are close but have retained their
idiosyncrasies or, to express it better, their internal coherence and
meaning.
I love
this new globalized world. I find cross-cultural encounters at once thrilling,
challenging, and desirable, for men and women as for cuisines.
However,
as it is currently practiced in many restaurants and blog recipes, “fusion”
often does away with well-honed traditional associations of ingredients or new
harmonious juxtapositions for the sake of displaying would-be creative
(arbitrary) combinations. Although it appeals to many people (Sooo
creative..!), I believe it loses culinary and gustatory meaning.
It is
appealing to jump from one taste universe to another, to add a foreign touch to
a favorite dish, and to invent a new combination entirely. But when you do, you
must have an objective or a purpose for the final result. (4) If we let chance
replace talent, given the number of world cuisine ingredients available now in
the United States and the possible combinations of all those, we can expect
billions of new unsatisfactory “fusion” dishes. Can the tide be reversed?
Cooking in the Real World
The
current erosion of home cooking and taste education in developed countries is
often explained by a lack of time, but this does not withstand a serious
analysis. If you are genuinely interested in cooking, you can always “find the
time” to do it. Of course, it helps to be happily married and share values and
responsibilities
In the
real world, I had to work myself, 60 to 70 hours a week. My wife also worked,
and we managed to raise a family, maintain social contacts, and attend to
multiple interests. We both cook pretty well, each of us with our own
preferences, which helps with diversity. After the week-end errands and
cooking, the refrigerator would be fully stocked with fresh and pre-cooked
items, enough for the whole week. We have both always loved leftovers and this
helped.
We
thought our main cooking responsibility to our children was to nourish them
well, with regularity, while educating their taste. It would be the rare
American child who would request pork roast with Brussels sprouts for his 10th
birthday. It happened to us and we are still proud. Today, we are cooking for
and with the new generation, walking the fine line between pedagogy and fun,
with great hopes for the future.
We have
also had many guests at home and prepared countless meals together, engaging in
different, complementary tasks, and managing yet another invitation with
exhilarating success.
Strangely,
I suddenly miss not having had the experience of cooking with other adults more
often. Most of the time, we invite 4 to 6 people and preparing a full meal is
technically quite achievable in a short time. However, I wonder now if I could
sometimes share more with the same good friends by giving up my preferences for
inspirational last-minute cooking, planning ahead, finding ways to share tasks,
and witnessing together the gradual transformation of promising raw produce
into a delightful meal. Only food related conversation would be allowed.
Although
less efficient, wouldn’t it be more enriching for all people concerned?
(1) In
his blog The Frontal Cortex, Jonah Lehrer wrote in 2009 a wonderfully
penetrating article on his experience of home cooking.
(2) In
the same article, Jonah Lehrer explains it well, writing about ”the way the
flavors I could name mingled into a taste I could not”
(3) Loving
produce means that you have to find your own balance between quality and cost.
Farmers markets in the US are generally the best bet. I would exclude
air-conditioned, morgue-like supermarkets, which should be more appropriately
called undermarkets, at least for fresh produce!
(4) This
is why the backbone of tradition is so important, not as a straitjacket but as
testimony to previous efforts and wisdom accrued over time by countless unsung
and unknown contributors.
No comments:
Post a Comment